Moreover, it can be seen that many of these so-called right-wing internet users are in his following list and often appear in his comment section, indicating that they are very likely his personal friends. These people are extremely hypocritical; the reason they do not oppose the CPI (Maoist) is simply because they have no idea what revolutionary actions the CPI (Maoist) has undertaken. Their posts are actually slanders against the CPI (Maoist), attempting to belittle the CPI (Maoist) as counter-revolutionaries like themselves who seek to exploit the revolution for personal gain, mingling within the revolutionary ranks to become warlords enjoying wealth and pleasure. The reason they oppose the forum and the organization is that the forum and organization have realistically analyzed the revolutionary situation in China and the various factors hindering the Chinese revolution. In the past, they could use language barriers and the “latest theories” of international communist revolution as excuses for their pretentious fake revolution. Now that the forum has developed and the communist movement in China is growing stronger day by day, those decadent and corrupt literary and artistic works they rely on are increasingly recognized and criticized by people. Therefore, these fascist elements are all afraid; faced with true revolutionaries, their true colors are revealed. Hence, they must simultaneously launch frenzied attacks on the forum while hypocritically shedding crocodile tears, mourning for the CPI (Maoist).
Indeed, these fascists have no capacity for independent thought. If the government consistently implemented just and democratic measures and only encountered issues with the Jiangyou problem, would the masses have reacted so strongly? If it were not for fascist rule, it would be impossible to resolve issues through bourgeois democratic means of reporting. If life were not filled with fascist rule and persecution, would the broad masses of working people be so angry when encountering such matters?
Probably this “Brown Bear” is uneducated and has never read the documents of the Communist Party of India (Maoist), and does not know that the Communist Party of India (Maoist) also opposes pornography.
This song is indeed by Su Xiu, but the content isn’t really counter-revolutionary, is it?
Is there any non-reactionary claim about the literature and art created by a revisionist country? Is there any literature and art that can be neither counter-revolutionary nor revolutionary?
I had heard it before, but never really remembered the lyrics. I just glanced at it, and isn’t this kind of music similar to Nazi songs like “The Day Will Come”? When the Soviet people were suffering under the torment of Soviet revisionist fascist rule, this idiot author wrote such a song telling the Soviet people to bravely and fearlessly fight in the war. On the surface, it mentions Lenin a few times, but in reality, it completely emasculates Leninism. It calls on the broad working masses to die for the Soviet revisionists’ imperialist war. Isn’t this kind of song reactionary?
Is it possible that the author is subtly expressing revolutionary ideas?
Do you consider someone who can openly disseminate their work and hold a high position in a fascist country to be a revolutionary?
"Bakhemutoha gained a high reputation across the Soviet Union. It is said that she was Brezhnev’s favorite composer, receiving multiple awards from the Soviet government and Soviet State Prizes (formerly Stalin Prizes) and serving as the secretary of the Soviet and Russian Federation Composer Association. In 1990, Bakhemutoha was awarded the title of Hero of Socialist Labour, and her name was used to name the Asteroid 1889 by the planetary research center in Cincinnati in Ohio.
After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Bakhemutoha continued to be active in the music scene. Although she is over eighty years old, she has not stopped working to enjoy her retirement. We still occasionally see her as a judge at various Russian song contests, and she and her husband and collaborator, the famous poet Nikolai Dobronravov, often travel across Russia to participate in various social activities. We also frequently read articles about her life, work, and songs in Russian newspapers, and Russian radio stations often broadcast her songs and special programs. Since the 1990s, she has released six albums and held numerous solo concerts." Source: Baidu Baike
“Battle Will Continue” was jointly created by Soviet composer Bachmutova and poet Dobronravov, and premiered at the closing ceremony of the 17th Congress of the Soviet Komsomol in 1974. Bachmutova was Brezhnev’s favorite composer and received numerous awards after the Soviet Union’s revisionism. Does such a person have any revolutionary ideas?
I don’t know this author, but regarding what you said earlier, how would you explain someone like Lu Xun?
When did Lu Xun, during the period of the Nationalist Government’s rule, encourage the masses to go to their deaths fighting the Soviet Union and support the united front?
Understood, thank you for the clarification.
Proletarian supremacism evaluates a person or a work through serious investigation and analysis, rather than subjective speculation. You asked jqr, “Do you consider someone who can openly disseminate their work in a fascist country and holds a high position as a revolutionary?” to explain someone like Lu Xun. But the problem is that Lu Xun was not in a high position, and his works were not entirely openly disseminated. Lu Xun had to move frequently and change pen names multiple times to avoid arrest and investigation. These two situations cannot be generalized in the same way. The nature of “The Battle Continues” can be inferred simply by checking an encyclopedia.
Moreover, Lu Xun was also not welcomed by the Nationalist Government. Lu Xun was attacked not only by the Nationalist Government’s official literati but also by the bourgeois petty-bourgeois right-wing intellectuals hidden within the Communist Party. Lu Xun’s articles were based on the revolutionary situation in China at that time, using Marxist literary theory to criticize feudal culture, Confucianism, the oppression of women, and the Nationalist Government’s slander of the communist movement. This kind of idiotic revisionist composer is simply not worthy to be mentioned in the same breath as Lu Xun.
Furthermore, judging from the content of this song, and comparing it with other revolutionary songs, it is clear that many revolutionary songs from the socialist period talk about class struggle, the socialist revolutionary cause, and accuse the exploiting class of numerous crimes. However, this song contains none of those elements. On the eve of the world war crisis, it loudly proclaims, “The battle will continue, full of passion, hearts soaring, we are the young Lenin moving forward! Youth of October,” pretending to mention Lenin, but in reality, it does not discuss the enslavement and persecution of the broad Soviet people by the Soviet revisionist government. It also disgustingly says, “The globe’s heat and cold are uneven, the world’s rich and poor hard to equalize, global youth united as one, transforming the world striving to be the vanguard,” using this vulgar analogy to replace actual class struggle. It also talks about uniting as one and transforming the world, which in fact means establishing a “community of shared human destiny,” asking the world’s youth to support the Soviet revisionists and America’s wars, portraying the Soviet revisionists as the just side.
To be frank, I am actually just a neutral observer. I came to this forum because after watching B站 (Bilibili), I became very interested in related topics and wanted to understand the revolutionary people’s spirit and demeanor. Honestly, I think you are all very hardworking and brave, with a high level of theoretical understanding. Compared to the leftist circles online, your level is much higher, and your quality is also good. How should I put it? If one day you succeed, I hope that at that time I can have an open and free discussion with you. Right now, I am just an opportunist with a low level of theory, and if I make any mistakes in my forum posts, I welcome your corrections.
Although the forum does not exclude such behavior, I feel that your statement still has problems. You talk about neutral observers, but such people simply do not exist. In a class society, everyone either stands on the side of the oppressed class against the oppressing class, or stands on the side of the oppressing class against the oppressed class. If one is not on the side of socialism, then consciously or unconsciously, one supports the rule of capitalism and hinders the progress of the revolution. Some petty bourgeois who have goodwill towards revolutionary activities, due to their residual capitalist thinking, hesitate and waver when it comes to further participation in the revolution. This is completely understandable, but it can never be used as a reason for not transforming oneself or not revolting; it is entirely unreasonable.
What you are saying is nothing more than a defense of the legitimacy of your own position. Moreover, your remarks about low-theoretical-level speculators are also quite ridiculous. Either you deliberately lower yourself in order to avoid condemnation through such means, so you can continue to keep your lifestyle or secretly maintain your erroneous views while feeling justified in doing so, or you are openly shameless, believing that engaging in speculative activities is nothing to be ashamed of. I believe both points are wrong and reactionary.
This situation also coincides exactly with what is recorded in “The Communist Manifesto”: To conduct a sacred crackdown on this ghost, all forces of old Europe, the Pope and the Tsar, Metternich and Kise, the French radicals and German police, united. It shows that although reactionaries are outwardly divided and argue fiercely, their fundamental class interests are the same, which is to oppose communism and oppose the people!
Why bother with this little brat?
These petty-bourgeois right-wingers, some of whom are even bourgeois in words but can actually do such things. The Nazi SS was composed of these people. They don’t really want to cut off the heads of the association members, nor would they say such things. People cannot say things that are not in their worldview.