Diary of Long Live the Revolution

April 25

Since I started using the forum, five days a week of school life has become越来越折磨人了, but I must say this is a good phenomenon. I’ve completely shaken off the numbness of speculative studies in the past few years and am increasingly able to feel the reality wrapped in beautiful words.

First, a report on this week’s study progress: I’m reading Volume I of the 72-year edition of Lenin’s Selected Works. Excluding the large economic section “The Development of Russian Capitalism” that I skipped, I’m almost done with What Is to Be Done? I can deeply feel that I was almost two different people before and after reading What Is to Be Done? Next week I plan to continue with Lenin’s selections, the week after next with An Introduction to Political Economy, because I clearly feel how ignorant I am about the most important economic content.

This Wednesday and Thursday I took exams; the results are out but not yet checked. I feel I performed roughly at the same level as before. Theoretical study hardly affects speculative study, but next Thursday I have another exam, then after the Labor Day holiday there’s midterms again—truly disgusting.

Regarding events from the earlier weeks: at school I’ve been trying to tell the friends I get along with well a few political views, but without exception they’ve shown reactionary stances. One is a student from the Tsinghua-Peking class. I told him about China’s “aid” to Africa, and he said Africans are oppressed by choice, one who wants to fight, one who wants to endure. Another dream of his is to join the army. I mentioned a little about military suppression, and he smiled and said: “If I become a soldier in the future and my leadership’s uprising happens in my hometown, I would press the missile button with great sorrow.” It’s terrifying. After my attempts, when I looked for the first person again, he thought what I said made sense. His plan is to be neutral. I’ve met him several times since; he seems to have been immersed in the speculative study of the Tsinghua-Peking class. Now when I message him on QQ, he doesn’t respond, and I’m not sure I want to talk to him either. Someone who shared a dorm with him agrees with my view of the current system. I had hoped for him, but when the topic expanded to Stalin, he began to attack. I asked how he knew about these things, he said he learned from “Old White Theater” (a reference), which made me incredibly angry. I’ve met him several more times; he’s also immersed in the speculative study of the Tsinghua-Peking class, and his family is very strict about electronics. In the end he said conditions don’t allow it, he can only go with the flow like other days. Now I don’t talk to him much.

Also about the two “comrades” I mentioned in my self-introduction: one of them I brought Lenin’s Selected Works for and watched in secret in the dorm. But his problem is very big: besides buying Lenin’s Selected Works, he also brought home the Mao Zedong Selected Works after reform and reads them with great interest. Despite my reminders, he hasn’t taken Mao’s works with him, saying something about redacted editions still being learnable. He basically treats Marxism as a joke and a pastime, and in daily life hasn’t expressed criticisms of the current regime; instead he keeps asking stupid questions. I’ve almost given up hope for him. The other is the one who treats Nazi salutes as a joke. I won’t go into other details; we were having a meal when I angrily said: “If you don’t study theory, you’ll die, Feng.” He retorted, “Die, Feng! Your whole family will die.” This reflects my own great problems, but also shows his issues.

In short, the lesson from the past few weeks is that you must not express political views casually, even to close people. Revolutionary-leaning students are still very few. But up to now I still haven’t revealed political views to my family and I don’t know whether that’s right or wrong.

This week’s important point is that I broke with that Trotskyist who was on QQ. Every week when he comes back, he chats with me for several hours, constantly sending doctored photos of Stalin and Mao Zedong. I endure my anger and discuss current situations with him, as well as their Trotskyist organization; I try to avoid differences. Now I know they have their own organization, mainly active on Telegram, with an official account on Bilibili “Defend Ma Network,” also accounts on Twitter, and a publishing site called “The Bolshevik.” From what he says, he counts more than 80 people who have published articles in The Bolshevik, likely a few hundred people in total. He’s a reader who collects information to help the Trotskyist organization. He’s a high school senior in Jiangsu who, led by classmates, came into Troism. He created a group that includes all kinds of people: libertarians, anarchists, etc. This week, after coming back, I learned from the forum about various crimes of Chinese Trotskyists. He used to reply to my messages instantly; this time when I sent these messages, he stopped replying. In the end I sent a few ugly photos of Trotsky and blocked him.

From now on updates should be weekly.

image: 1777118258715|543x500

14 Likes

First, you must analyze your parents’ class position and what practices you will undertake; Chairman Mao said, “Do not fight unprepared battles.”

6 Likes

Your mother’s belief in Buddhism is actually using religion as a spiritual opium to numb herself; you could analyze with her why her salary is so low and why she praises the middle path.

2 Likes

This week I’m revealing politics to my parents, but the effect isn’t great. My dad keeps working as usual, and my mom was serious for a while but then nothing changed; in fact, the relationship has become a bit distant.

In any case, I’ll share some materials. These come from the group I mentioned earlier. Some were originally in foreign languages without translations, but they translated them themselves; some are their own summary materials; others were taken directly from zlibrary. There are hundreds of documents in total, but I’m only selecting a small portion.

Piataikov’s Flight: Trotsky and Nazi Tactical Cooperation_ zh.pdf

Agriculture during the Soviet Fifteen Years of Proletarian Dictatorship.pdf

Russia-Soviet Union 1917-1945_ Complete History Textbook Volume 3 (Yevgeny Yuryevich Spirin) (Z-L.pdf

Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin on Dialectical Materialism and Historical Materialism.pdf

Selected Essays on Price Formation under the Socialist System (Institute of Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Political Economy Group) (Z-Library).pdf

Trotsky Conspiracy Case, Bukharin Conspiracy Case, Bialiа Conspiracy Case Materials Collection.pdf

There Was No Massacre in Kazakhstan (Chinese translation).pdf

Lenin, Stalin on State capitalism and New Economic Policy, Stalin on the basic path of Soviet industrial development, and the Communist Party history on price policy and agricultural collectivization policy (1953) — Zhejiang Provincial Propaganda Department, CPC.pdf

[Integrated版] Main Contents of Socialist Political Economy.pdf|attachment](upload://zwnYpOwzGhCvKuXhQEusTr3joq4.pdf)

Stalin’s Economics.pdf

Selected Papers on State Theory by Lenin, Stalin, Khrushchev.pdf

【Yesterday Soviet Series 39】Ernst Talmann Selected Articles and Speeches (translated by Yesterday Soviet Editorial Board, German Uni Party Research Institute) (z-library.sk, 1lib.sk, z-lib.sk)(1).pdf

【Yesterday Soviet Series 40】Walter Ulbricht Selected Articles and Speeches (Democratic Germany) translated by the Yesterday Soviet Editorial Board (z-library.sk, 1lib.sk, z-lib.sk).pdf

【Yesterday Soviet Series 38】Sergei Kirov Selected Essays, Speeches and Biographies (Soviet) D. Chugaev, L. Peterson, ed. (Yesterday Soviet Editorial Board translated).pdf

Industrialization of Soviet Russia 1 Socialist Offensive: Soviet Agricultural Collectivization, 1929-1930 (Davis) (Z-Library).pdf

The 140 conversations with Molotov (by Chuyev, translated by Wang Nanzhi et al.; Molotov, translated by Wang Nanzhi et al.; Chuyev, Wang Nanzhi) (z-library.sk, 1lib.sk, z-lib.sk).pdf

I feel Comrade Molotov has been somewhat stigmatized; according to the summary from that group, Molotov adhered to world revolution and sought to carry out continuous revolution under the dictatorship of the proletariat (though he was not aware of it).

Do you know the term “Molotov breadbasket”? It was said when your Soviet armed forces invaded Finland, deployed bombers to bomb innocent Finnish civilians. In the face of international condemnation, Molotov claimed it wasn’t bombs, but a breadbasket dropped to the poor Finnish people. Moreover, I’m not saying the Soviet Union was incapable; the USSR did pursue relatively radical revolution during Stalin’s era, but the Finnish-Soviet War and the annexation of the Baltic states also reflect great-power chauvinism. Speaking of the Baltic region, from 1940 to 1948 the Soviet Union expelled Lithuanians five times, drove 130,000 people to Siberia, most of whom were women and children. The proportion of the original Latvian ethnic group also fell from 84% in 1945 to 60%. The Forest Brothers resisted until after World War II. At the same time, I think the assassination of Trotsky was indeed dishonorable.

5 Likes

First of all, you make up a pile of fake data out of thin air here without any basis, just like the propaganda in a certain edited document during the Cultural Revolution that claimed 30 million deaths in the Xinyang area—that is exactly the same. You ignore the fact that Finnish bourgeoisie sacrificed themselves for imperialist aggression against the Soviet Union to destroy socialist countries, and instead hype Mannesheim (Mannehaim) these bourgeois as making the Finnish people cannon fodder and killing Soviet Red Army soldiers as their “great achievements.” This kind of rhetoric is truly reactionary and shameless.

7 Likes

You probably got the ‘Molotov bread basket’ from a marketing account. You’re looking at history from the Mannheimer perspective, talking about armed invasion of Finland and bombing civilians—what basis do you have for that? Is ‘condemnation by the international community’ referring to the official newspaper of imperialism? I’d advise you to read more Marxist literature.

6 Likes

Where did these materials come from? I find it ridiculous. Have you seen the posts we made in our forum in March about the CCP rebutting the smear of Stalin? Why come here to say anything nonsense? These pseudoscientific claims—to gullible bourgeois who don’t know better—are no different. To come here and talk this way is simply self-defeating humiliation. If you can believe it and say this here, it shows your position is aligned with the revisionists and imperialists, wildly smearing and slandering the great socialist republic.

7 Likes

You say Trotsky was assassinated by civilian scientists? Wasn’t it Trotsky and his followers who killed each other in internal strife?

4 Likes

Narrow-minded bourgeois pseudoscience is spreading rumors. If you learn a bit of Marxism, you’ll know that the Soviet Union was a state established by workers and peasants, that they followed the principle of internationalism, and that their interests were entirely aligned with the working people of other countries. Their interests were completely opposed to those of other countries’ exploitative classes, rich farmers, landowners, and the bourgeoisie. In that case, how could the Soviet Union possibly slaughter civilians in other countries or engage in racism? On the other hand, the sources of the rumors you believe—America, Britain, Nazi Germany, and others—are the real butchers of the people, bombing civilians all over. How could you not see that, as if you were blind? No, with class analysis you can only become a victim of being fooled and fooling yourself. It’s also ridiculous to claim that Trotsky should be vindicated; he himself helped organize the Troika Alliance in the Soviet Union and engaged in crazy assassinations of Soviet revolutionary cadres. Why doesn’t he speak up? He wrecked women who belonged to party dissidents, and they were killed, and now it’s said to have been Soviet assassination—absurd.

11 Likes

Lenin once said: “When people have not yet revealed the interests of these or those classes from any kind of discourse, statements, and promises about morality, religion, politics, and society, they have always been, in the past or in the future, foolish victims of being deceived in politics and deceiving themselves.” I believe that these slanders and smears show not only that you are a foolish victim, but also that you are lying to yourself and others to pursue personal interests. I want to ask, what political purpose is behind Black-Soviet opposition to the USSR?

7 Likes

I’m not a child or a pro-Soviet person, this is a fact. I’m also a social democrat, I didn’t completely deny the Soviet Union. These are all things my school history teacher told me; history teachers can’t possibly lie to me. This forum was also推荐 to me by my Western Marxist online friends, they say it’s a forum for the Soviet Union and Marxism. I’m here to have a good, constructive exchange with you all as well.

2 Likes

Pavel Sudoplatov was the NKVD (People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs) chief responsible for overseas assassinations, code-named Operation Catfish.

In his memoir, Special Tasks, published in 1994 (authorized Chinese translation), it is clearly recorded: in March 1939, Beria took me to the Kremlin to meet Stalin. Stalin personally ordered:

“Within a year, Trotsky must be eliminated. War is inevitable; Trotsky’s existence would undermine the international anti-fascist alliance of the working class movement. Trotsky is the only political leader of the Trotskyists; removing him would cause the entire movement to collapse.”
Stalin also promised: after success, all participants and their families would be cared for by the state for life.

Is Ramón Merka de not a KGB agent?

And you guys keep hiding the posts I send, are you planning to “dictatorship of the proletariat” over me?

Chairman Maoalso said, “Let people speak, the sky won’t collapse.”

Once you open your mouth, you exude the臭 smell of patriarchy. Secondly, is the so-called “social democracy” in your mouth perhaps the “social democracy” of Bernstein-Kautsky? You strongly believe all sorts of bourgeois fabrications about the socialist Soviet Union, while you resist materials about the socialist Soviet Union in every possible way, which also shows whose side you’re on. Claiming that a “history teacher” could never lie to you is even more ridiculous; teachers in bourgeois academies are running dogs of the reformist camp—taking surplus value skimmed from the working people by reformists, while spreading a little bit of useless distortions of “knowledge.” Every word they say is forged according to bourgeois interests—where is there any “absolutely objective, fair, and just” historical material?

Lastly, terms like “Soviet Union of the horse” and “Western-style socialism” to erase class nature are not as good as replacing them with “revolutionary Marxism” and “pretend Marxism, true opportunism” which fit better.

8 Likes

What the heck, because you copied and pasted too quickly, the system detected you were spamming and hidden it. I’m the one who released it after review. Who’s afraid you post these pseudo-scientific things? People have seen them plenty of times.

11 Likes

Then I also want to say that right-wing elements use the policy of “letting a hundred flowers blossom, a hundred schools of thought contend” to incite revolutionary public opinion; for the bourgeoisie and all their running dogs, the stricter the dictatorship, the better. We will not blindly trust opportunist traitors’ talk of “safety and harmony.” However, allowing bourgeois debaters to reveal their true faces in broad daylight and compare them with Marxism is more conducive to letting the masses see the true faces of certain people.

2 Likes