Today I saw a news report saying that after a single divorced woman bought curtains, the owner of the curtain shop repeatedly harassed her and eventually raped her. But even with direct evidence, the police still claimed there was no criminal conduct and refused to file the case.
I also saw comments before where some reactionaries were still preaching victim-blaming, saying things like both parties were adults and the victim should have just refused, or that the woman herself let the man into the house, let him drink, and even let this rapist sleep in her home.
But what actually happened?
After the curtains were made, Pu personally went to her home to install them, and later he kept messaging her on WeChat to ask after her and show concern.
The WeChat chat records between Wang Yu and the reporter show that one evening at 9:10 p.m., Pu said, “Come over and take a look at you.” Wang Yu replied, “During the day maybe, but I get sleepy and can’t stay up late. I always go to bed very early.”
One afternoon at 5:30 p.m., Pu said, “Come to your place for dinner.” Wang Yu said she was not at home and was eating with several old classmates, and Pu then said, “Let’s go to your place and make noodles.” After being refused, he asked again, “Aren’t you coming back? Tonight?” He also said, “I have nowhere to go tonight; I had a fight with my wife. Let me come to your place.” Wang Yu replied, “If you’re free during the day, you can come over. I’ll keep you company and chat.”
It is clear that before the incident, this rapist was maliciously harassing Wang Yu, and it was precisely because he knew Wang Yu was a woman living alone that he dared to act so recklessly. Wang Yu’s words were clearly a rejection of this rapist; it was by no means her主动 inviting him to her home.
On the day of the incident, Wang Yu was still trying to refuse the rapist’s attempts to come to her home, but this man had other intentions and went directly to the foot of her building, then brazenly carried out sexual harassment, acting outrageously.
The two people’s WeChat chat records show that at 7:28 p.m. that night, Pu said, “Coming to find you.” Wang Yu said, “Not at home, at the beauty salon.” Pu then said, “It’s really hard to see you.” Wang Yu said, “What use would it be even if we met?”
Wang Yu recalled to the reporter that around 9 p.m. that night, Pu told her again that he had been drinking and wanted to ride his bike to her place to keep her company while having a drink. “I said if you’re drunk, then come another day, because I was worried it wouldn’t be safe to ride a bike.”
At 9:41 p.m. that night, Pu told Wang Yu on WeChat, “I’m downstairs.” Wang Yu said that thinking back to how Pu had once helped her repair the kitchen sink for free, she felt indebted to him, and out of politeness let him come upstairs.
She recalled that a few minutes later, Pu came to her home and said he wanted to drink. She took out the goji berry liquor she had brewed herself, and the two of them started drinking in the living room.
“I usually don’t drink, and after just over ten minutes that night I felt dizzy. I wanted to rest, so I asked him to leave, but he wouldn’t go back. I said I’d call him a taxi, but he still wouldn’t leave.” Wang Yu said that to prevent an accident, she secretly recorded part of their conversation at the time.
A 3-minute-21-second recording Wang Yu provided to the reporter shows that she repeatedly told Pu to go home and sleep, and Pu said, “I’d die before going back. You need to be mentally prepared.” Wang Yu repeatedly said she would call a taxi to pick him up, but he refused every time.
“Later, seeing that he really didn’t want to leave, I told him to sleep in the big bed and I’d sleep on the sofa,” Wang Yu said. She did not expect Pu to then say, “Where you sleep, I sleep.” She said that later Pu agreed that she would sleep in the bed and he would sleep on the living room sofa, “so I went into the bedroom and slept with my clothes on, because the lock on the room was broken and I couldn’t lock it from the inside.”
After the rape incident, Wang Yu reported it to the police in time and obtained direct evidence proving the sexual assault, but the police actually said: “After review, we believe this case contains no criminal facts. In accordance with Article 112 of the Criminal Procedure Law, it has been decided not to file the case.” After Wang Yu applied for reconsideration and review to the county public security bureau and the municipal public security bureau respectively, both were rejected and the decision not to file the case was upheld. The two levels of public security bureaus even shamelessly claimed “the facts are clear and the basis is accurate,” acting entirely as a shield for the rapist.
In this incident, the rapist never appeared in person; it was his wife who spoke instead. From the fact that they have run a guesthouse hotel and done business for many years, it can be seen that this couple belongs to the bourgeoisie. Compared with the victim, a divorced woman living alone, they are obviously in a position of advantage, and the Chinese revisionist police are precisely lackeys who protect this kind of exploiting class. That is why this person could brazenly say things like telling Wang Yu to report it if she had solid evidence. Their class nature determines their thinking, which is why this person shamelessly turned around and accused Wang Yu of being jealous and trying to achieve some unspeakable purpose. Moreover, this person is also extremely misogynistic, saying things like “adult life is based on mutual consent” and “I have no right to ask my husband,” exposing the collusion of interests between the two very clearly.
The reporter dialed Pu’s phone number, and the person who answered was his wife, who said her husband was not there and that their family runs a guesthouse hotel, which she usually manages.
When asked about Wang Yu’s claims, she replied to the reporter, “Tell her to report it to the police.” She further said that they have been doing business in the county for many years, and some people have become jealous. “Adult life is about mutual consent. If she can’t achieve her goal in some kind of relationship, then if she has solid evidence, she can just report it to the police. There will naturally be justice.”
Pu’s wife also said, “Our family does business. It’s normal for my husband to go to her place — installing curtains, doing repairs, even measuring sizes, he’s been to her home before. They’re all acquaintances.”
As for the specific situation that night, Pu’s wife said, “I don’t want to ask my husband. This is adult life; if the evidence is enough, then report it to the police.” “This matter involves privacy. Even though he is my husband, I don’t have the right to ask him.” After saying that, she hung up.
Seeing these news reports, I feel like recently there seems to have been a reactionary tide of the police refusing to file rape cases.
A few days ago there was the news that after a 13-year-old girl in Yuncheng, Shanxi was raped, the police refused to file the case.
Mr. Xie recalled that during the day on April 30, his younger sister, accompanied by family members, went to the Yaomeng Police Station to report the case, but the police did not accept it, citing unclear facts. Later, his sister went to the hospital for an examination and a vaginal secretion sample was collected. On May 8, his sister went to the Yuncheng Maternal and Child Health Hospital for a bone age test, and the imaging diagnosis report stated, “consistent with a bone age of 13.”
Mr. Xie said that after repeated communication, it was not until May 14 that the Salt Lake Branch of the Yuncheng Public Security Bureau issued them a case acceptance receipt.
But afterward, the police still did not file the case. On June 20, Mr. Xie took the case acceptance receipt to the Shanxi Provincial Public Security Department to inquire about the progress and only then learned that the Salt Lake Branch had already decided not to file the case on June 12.
山西运城“13岁女孩称被强奸案”进展：报警近两月后警方立案|山西省|运城市|不予立案|案件|盐湖_新浪新闻 ，
There was also news about a 17-year-old girl who was brutally beaten, raped, and sexually assaulted by a horribly twisted violent criminal rapist, who threatened to “pull out fingernails” and “deep-fry fingers,” and she reported it to the police in both Nanjing and Hangzhou. The result:
On May 9, regarding Xiao Sheng’s accusation of rape, the Jianye Branch of the Nanjing Public Security Bureau, after review, believed that “the existing evidence cannot prove the criminal facts alleged, and decided not to file the case.” On May 10, in response to the rape allegation, the Xihu District Branch of the Hangzhou Public Security Bureau reviewed it and believed that “there are no criminal facts, and decided not to file the case.”
“拔指甲、油炸手指”？17岁女孩举报江西财大一男生恶行(组图) 江西财经大学 | 学生 | 女生 | 性侵 | 社会百态 || 看中国网
Recently, netizen Mr. Zhong from Ulanhot, Inner Mongolia said that his younger sister Zhang was sexually assaulted by two men when she was 13. The police determined that criminal facts existed and opened a rape case for investigation, but four months later the case was revoked on the grounds that there were no criminal facts. The explanation given was that both sides had consensual sex, and that the man did not know the girl was under 14. Mr. Zhong said he would continue to appeal and hoped the police could reopen the case.
Original article URL: 13-year-old girl in Inner Mongolia sexually assaulted by 2 men, case filed then revoked; police say “both sides consented,” sparking controversy | Hong Kong 01 内蒙古13岁女孩遭2男性侵立案后被撤案 警方称“双方自愿”惹议
