【Old news】Korean military suffers heavy casualties in Ukraine, possibly expanding conscription

Political commentary
1

Creation: Political Economy Group of the Proletarian Liberation Struggle Association
Creation Date: December 19, 2024

Note: Since the North Korean official recently acknowledged its troop deployment, this past political commentary is provided for reference only

  Recently, North Korea’s deployment of troops to join the Russia-Ukraine war is a significant development on the battlefield. U.S. Secretary of State Blinken disclosed at a press conference on October 31 that about 8,000 North Korean soldiers had arrived in Kursk, undergoing combat training in artillery, drone operation, and infantry. However, how much can the decayed North Korean army differ from the Russian forces? Recently, in the tense battlefield of Kursk, it seems there is an answer.

  On December 17, according to Ukrainian sources, in Kursk Oblast, North Korean troops fought on the front lines of Ukrainian-occupied territory from the 14th to the 16th, with a total of 50 soldiers killed and 47 wounded over three days, with over 200 personnel online. On the 18th, Ukraine’s special operations forces released a series of “first-person view drone” aerial footage widely circulated online. The footage shows some Asian-looking North Korean soldiers becoming targets of precise drone attacks, with several soldiers hiding in the bushes, still being tracked and locked on by drones. The video also recorded scenes of cluster munition explosions, causing heavy casualties.

  Such situations prove that North Korean troops have already been massively deployed on the Russia-Ukraine battlefield. In response, Ukrainian intelligence chief Kyrylo Budanov revealed that Russia has formed a Russo-North Korean joint force and begun large-scale deployment of North Korean soldiers. However, language barriers have caused serious difficulties in management and coordination within the joint forces.

  In fact, war is always a continuation of politics, and the disastrous defeat of North Korean troops on the Russia-Ukraine battlefield is not solely due to language or tactical issues. As a fascist state cloaked in socialism, North Korea is actually extremely reactionary. Even within the core of the monopoly bourgeoisie’s rule—the military—soldiers generally live in dire conditions. Previously, defectors believed that North Korean soldiers dispatched to Russia did not have to worry about food shortages, thus feeling more satisfied. However, as a colonial state within the imperialist bloc of China and Russia, how could North Korean soldiers truly be treated well by the Russian imperialist army? Most likely, North Korea’s troop dispatch is merely a way to exchange “human lives” for military technology aid, used for confrontation on the Korean Peninsula. Earlier South Korean public opinion generally believed that soldiers sent to the Ukrainian battlefield were likely just cannon fodder. Their deaths and injuries would not genuinely improve the lives of the working people in North Korea, and the monthly $2,000 pay would probably end up in Kim Jong-un and his ruling clique’s pockets. In fact, there are reports from Ukraine that North Korean soldiers stationed in Kursk still do not receive enough food supplies, and the Russian military can only allocate reserves from 11 airborne assault brigades to supplement them, which can be described as a case of the pot calling the kettle black.

  Faced with heavy casualties, what will North Korea do next? According to South Korean reports, North Korea may accelerate the deployment of a second batch of troops. “Unlike the previously strictly selected elite Storm Corps, recent recruits are mostly voluntary, shortening mobilization time. Farmers and coal miners are expected to be the main sources, as these grassroots communities are eager to improve their social status through military service.” It is understood that after joining the fight, North Korean soldiers can become party members, which may change their personal fate, and their families can enjoy cadre treatment. However, as previously mentioned, whether it is the “compensation” for soldiers or the improvement of their待遇, it is merely a deception and forced conscription of the people. The so-called “deep mobilization” is just the fascist regime of North Korea expanding conscription and increasing oppression of the people. The broader the conscription, the closer both North Korea and Russia are to failure.

image
image1140×695 47.9 KB

5 Likes
2

These so-called “soldiers” are probably not genuine professional fighters, but rather North Korean workers disguised as “soldiers.” True professional soldiers are unlikely to be easily sent abroad. The North Korean military has a lot of padding because the military is allowed to engage in commercial activities, so North Korean warlords often recruit laborers “enlisted” through conscription. These “enlisted” impoverished North Korean people are nominally “soldiers,” but in reality, they may never have handled a gun or received any formal military training. Once they enter the military, they are treated as “engineers” and pulled into military enterprises as hired workers. These people are among the oppressed worker groups in North Korea. During wartime, North Korea is also the first to send these people to the front lines as cannon fodder to die. Now, sending “soldiers” to the Russian empire is probably also treating them as cannon fodder. So, on the one hand, these people are not real soldiers at all; on the other hand, subjectively, the North Korean people do not want to serve the fascist regime of North Korea, let alone go to foreign lands to die. Their combat effectiveness can be imagined.

1 Like
3

I remember that the North Korean soldiers who were captured recently said they only realized they were coming to fight when they arrived in Russia.

1 Like
4

Is North Korea also a social empire?

5

Colony

6

Whose colony is North Korea? Doesn’t it say it is a socialist country?

7

North Korea is not a socialist country, but a revisionist country. It has not yet become powerful enough to be called a social imperialist country. Currently, it is a colony of the China-Russia imperialist bloc.

2 Likes
8

In other words, North Korea is not an independent counter-revolutionary state. When did it become a colony? (At which point did the Qing restoration sign any important treaties?) Before this, I thought third-world countries had independent counter-revolutionary states, but thinking about it now, making such remarks would be misleading. If it were an independent counter-revolutionary state, it would have become a Second World country, i.e., a mid-zone. Was North Korea under Kim Il-sung’s rule an independent counter-revolutionary state? Or did it become a Soviet colony starting from the 1966 agreement on technical cooperation with the Soviet Union?

On June 20, 1966, the DPRK and the Soviet Union signed an economic-technical cooperation agreement. The Soviet Union would provide loans, experts, and technical assistance from 1966 to 1972, helping to build and expand a number of metal, energy, and petrochemical enterprises and projects in North Korea; to meet North Korea’s wishes, the Soviet Union agreed to extend the repayment period by 14 years for all amounts due and for long-term loans to be repaid in 1966–1970, and interest would not accrue on the extended loans.

I can’t find much about this; this is from Shen Zhihua, but I’ve heard in leftist circles that this person selectively quotes archival reports. I don’t know if there are any errors in this paragraph in the post—please enlighten me. :folded_hands:t2: